Back to Blog
CSS

CSS Grid vs Flexbox: When to Use Which

11 min read2063 words
#css#grid#flexbox#layout#responsive-design

After building dozens of responsive layouts over the past few years, I've noticed that the CSS Grid vs Flexbox debate still confuses many developers. While both have excellent browser support in 2025, knowing when to use each one can significantly improve your development speed and code maintainability.

I've seen teams waste hours wrestling with complex nested flexbox layouts that could be solved with three lines of Grid code, and I've also witnessed Grid being used for simple button alignments where Flexbox would be far more appropriate.

In this guide, I'll share the decision framework I use to choose between Grid and Flexbox, complete with practical examples from real projects where each approach shines.

The Fundamental Difference

The key distinction is dimensional:

  • Flexbox excels at one-dimensional layouts (either row or column)
  • CSS Grid handles two-dimensional layouts (rows and columns simultaneously)

This might sound simple, but the implications run deeper than you might think.

When Flexbox Dominates

Navigation Components

Flexbox remains unbeatable for navigation bars and toolbars. The dynamic spacing and alignment capabilities make it perfect for components that need to adapt to varying content.

/* Navigation with Flexbox */
.navbar {
  display: flex;
  justify-content: space-between;
  align-items: center;
  padding: 1rem 2rem;
  gap: 1rem;
}
 
.navbar-brand {
  font-size: 1.5rem;
  font-weight: bold;
}
 
.navbar-menu {
  display: flex;
  gap: 2rem;
  list-style: none;
  margin: 0;
  padding: 0;
}
 
.navbar-actions {
  display: flex;
  gap: 1rem;
  align-items: center;
}
<nav class="navbar">
  <div class="navbar-brand">Logo</div>
  <ul class="navbar-menu">
    <li><a href="/home">Home</a></li>
    <li><a href="/about">About</a></li>
    <li><a href="/contact">Contact</a></li>
  </ul>
  <div class="navbar-actions">
    <button class="btn-secondary">Login</button>
    <button class="btn-primary">Sign Up</button>
  </div>
</nav>

Form Controls and Button Groups

I've found that Flexbox handles form layouts beautifully, especially when you need consistent spacing and alignment across different input types.

/* Form with Flexbox */
.form-group {
  display: flex;
  flex-direction: column;
  gap: 0.5rem;
  margin-bottom: 1rem;
}
 
.form-row {
  display: flex;
  gap: 1rem;
}
 
.form-row .form-group {
  flex: 1;
}
 
.button-group {
  display: flex;
  gap: 1rem;
  justify-content: flex-end;
  margin-top: 2rem;
}
 
.input-with-button {
  display: flex;
  gap: 0.5rem;
}
 
.input-with-button input {
  flex: 1;
}
<form>
  <div class="form-row">
    <div class="form-group">
      <label for="first-name">First Name</label>
      <input type="text" id="first-name" name="firstName">
    </div>
    <div class="form-group">
      <label for="last-name">Last Name</label>
      <input type="text" id="last-name" name="lastName">
    </div>
  </div>
  
  <div class="form-group">
    <label for="email">Email</label>
    <div class="input-with-button">
      <input type="email" id="email" name="email">
      <button type="button">Verify</button>
    </div>
  </div>
  
  <div class="button-group">
    <button type="button" class="btn-secondary">Cancel</button>
    <button type="submit" class="btn-primary">Submit</button>
  </div>
</form>

Card Layouts with Dynamic Content

For card components where content height varies, Flexbox provides excellent automatic spacing and alignment.

/* Card with Flexbox */
.card {
  display: flex;
  flex-direction: column;
  border: 1px solid #e2e8f0;
  border-radius: 0.5rem;
  overflow: hidden;
  height: 100%;
}
 
.card-header {
  padding: 1rem;
  border-bottom: 1px solid #e2e8f0;
  background: #f8fafc;
}
 
.card-body {
  padding: 1rem;
  flex: 1; /* This takes up remaining space */
  display: flex;
  flex-direction: column;
  gap: 1rem;
}
 
.card-content {
  flex: 1;
}
 
.card-footer {
  padding: 1rem;
  border-top: 1px solid #e2e8f0;
  background: #f8fafc;
  margin-top: auto;
}

When CSS Grid Dominates

Page-Level Layouts

Grid excels at creating overall page structure. The ability to define named template areas makes complex layouts intuitive and maintainable.

/* Page layout with Grid */
.page-container {
  display: grid;
  min-height: 100vh;
  grid-template-areas:
    "header header"
    "sidebar main"
    "footer footer";
  grid-template-columns: 250px 1fr;
  grid-template-rows: auto 1fr auto;
  gap: 1rem;
}
 
.header {
  grid-area: header;
  background: #2d3748;
  color: white;
  padding: 1rem;
}
 
.sidebar {
  grid-area: sidebar;
  background: #f7fafc;
  padding: 1rem;
  border-right: 1px solid #e2e8f0;
}
 
.main-content {
  grid-area: main;
  padding: 1rem;
  overflow-y: auto;
}
 
.footer {
  grid-area: footer;
  background: #4a5568;
  color: white;
  padding: 1rem;
  text-align: center;
}
 
/* Responsive adjustments */
@media (max-width: 768px) {
  .page-container {
    grid-template-areas:
      "header"
      "main"
      "sidebar"
      "footer";
    grid-template-columns: 1fr;
    grid-template-rows: auto 1fr auto auto;
  }
  
  .sidebar {
    border-right: none;
    border-top: 1px solid #e2e8f0;
  }
}

Image Galleries and Product Grids

Grid's automatic placement and responsive capabilities make it perfect for image galleries and product listings.

/* Responsive grid gallery */
.gallery {
  display: grid;
  grid-template-columns: repeat(auto-fit, minmax(280px, 1fr));
  gap: 1rem;
  padding: 1rem;
}
 
.gallery-item {
  aspect-ratio: 16 / 9;
  border-radius: 0.5rem;
  overflow: hidden;
  position: relative;
  background: #f7fafc;
}
 
.gallery-item img {
  width: 100%;
  height: 100%;
  object-fit: cover;
  transition: transform 0.3s ease;
}
 
.gallery-item:hover img {
  transform: scale(1.05);
}
 
/* Featured item spans multiple columns */
.gallery-item.featured {
  grid-column: span 2;
}
 
@media (max-width: 640px) {
  .gallery {
    grid-template-columns: repeat(auto-fit, minmax(150px, 1fr));
  }
  
  .gallery-item.featured {
    grid-column: span 1; /* Reset on mobile */
  }
}

Dashboard Layouts

For complex dashboard interfaces where different sections need specific positioning, Grid provides unmatched control.

/* Dashboard with Grid */
.dashboard {
  display: grid;
  grid-template-areas:
    "stats stats stats"
    "chart1 chart2 sidebar"
    "table table sidebar";
  grid-template-columns: 2fr 2fr 1fr;
  grid-template-rows: auto 300px 1fr;
  gap: 1rem;
  padding: 1rem;
  min-height: calc(100vh - 80px);
}
 
.stats-section {
  grid-area: stats;
  display: grid;
  grid-template-columns: repeat(auto-fit, minmax(200px, 1fr));
  gap: 1rem;
}
 
.chart-primary {
  grid-area: chart1;
  background: white;
  border-radius: 0.5rem;
  padding: 1rem;
  box-shadow: 0 1px 3px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.1);
}
 
.chart-secondary {
  grid-area: chart2;
  background: white;
  border-radius: 0.5rem;
  padding: 1rem;
  box-shadow: 0 1px 3px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.1);
}
 
.sidebar-widgets {
  grid-area: sidebar;
  display: flex;
  flex-direction: column;
  gap: 1rem;
}
 
.data-table {
  grid-area: table;
  background: white;
  border-radius: 0.5rem;
  padding: 1rem;
  box-shadow: 0 1px 3px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.1);
  overflow: auto;
}
 
/* Responsive dashboard */
@media (max-width: 1024px) {
  .dashboard {
    grid-template-areas:
      "stats"
      "chart1"
      "chart2"
      "table"
      "sidebar";
    grid-template-columns: 1fr;
    grid-template-rows: auto auto auto auto auto;
  }
}

The Power of Combining Both

In real projects, I often use Grid and Flexbox together. Grid handles the macro layout structure, while Flexbox manages component-level alignment and spacing.

/* Hybrid approach */
.blog-layout {
  display: grid;
  grid-template-areas:
    "header header"
    "content sidebar"
    "footer footer";
  grid-template-columns: 1fr 300px;
  grid-template-rows: auto 1fr auto;
  gap: 2rem;
  max-width: 1200px;
  margin: 0 auto;
  padding: 1rem;
}
 
.blog-header {
  grid-area: header;
  display: flex; /* Flexbox inside Grid */
  justify-content: space-between;
  align-items: center;
  padding: 1rem 0;
  border-bottom: 2px solid #e2e8f0;
}
 
.blog-content {
  grid-area: content;
}
 
.blog-sidebar {
  grid-area: sidebar;
  display: flex; /* Flexbox inside Grid */
  flex-direction: column;
  gap: 2rem;
}
 
.sidebar-widget {
  display: flex; /* Flexbox for widget content */
  flex-direction: column;
  gap: 1rem;
  padding: 1rem;
  background: #f7fafc;
  border-radius: 0.5rem;
}
 
.widget-header {
  display: flex; /* Flexbox for header alignment */
  justify-content: space-between;
  align-items: center;
  font-weight: 600;
  color: #2d3748;
}
 
.blog-footer {
  grid-area: footer;
  display: flex; /* Flexbox inside Grid */
  justify-content: center;
  align-items: center;
  padding: 2rem 0;
  border-top: 1px solid #e2e8f0;
  margin-top: 2rem;
}

Modern CSS Features That Work Great With Both

Container Queries

Container queries have revolutionized responsive design. Both Grid and Flexbox work seamlessly with container queries for truly modular components.

/* Container queries with Grid and Flexbox */
.card-container {
  container-type: inline-size;
  container-name: card;
}
 
.card-grid {
  display: grid;
  grid-template-columns: repeat(auto-fit, minmax(280px, 1fr));
  gap: 1rem;
}
 
.card {
  display: flex;
  flex-direction: column;
}
 
@container card (max-width: 320px) {
  .card {
    /* Switch to compact layout */
    gap: 0.5rem;
  }
  
  .card-header {
    padding: 0.75rem;
    font-size: 0.9rem;
  }
}
 
@container card (min-width: 400px) {
  .card {
    /* Enhanced layout for larger containers */
    flex-direction: row;
  }
  
  .card-image {
    flex: 0 0 150px;
  }
  
  .card-content {
    flex: 1;
    padding: 1rem;
  }
}

Subgrid for Deep Alignment

Subgrid allows child grids to align with parent grid tracks, solving many nested layout challenges.

/* Subgrid example */
.product-listing {
  display: grid;
  grid-template-columns: repeat(auto-fit, minmax(300px, 1fr));
  gap: 1rem;
}
 
.product-card {
  display: grid;
  grid-template-rows: auto 1fr auto auto;
  gap: 1rem;
  background: white;
  border-radius: 0.5rem;
  padding: 1rem;
  box-shadow: 0 2px 4px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.1);
}
 
.product-options {
  display: grid;
  grid-template-columns: subgrid; /* Aligns with parent columns */
  gap: 0.5rem;
}

Performance Considerations

In my performance testing, both Grid and Flexbox are highly optimized in modern browsers. The performance differences are negligible for most use cases, but there are some patterns to be aware of:

/* Efficient Grid pattern */
.efficient-grid {
  display: grid;
  grid-template-columns: repeat(auto-fit, minmax(250px, 1fr));
  gap: 1rem;
  /* Avoid deeply nested grids when possible */
}
 
/* Efficient Flexbox pattern */
.efficient-flex {
  display: flex;
  flex-wrap: wrap;
  gap: 1rem;
  /* Use gap instead of margins for cleaner layout */
}
 
/* Avoid this - causes unnecessary recalculations */
.inefficient {
  display: flex;
  flex-direction: column;
}
 
.inefficient > * {
  margin-bottom: 1rem; /* Use gap instead */
}
 
.inefficient > *:last-child {
  margin-bottom: 0;
}

My Decision Framework

After working with both technologies extensively, here's the decision tree I use:

Use CSS Grid when:

  • You need to control both rows and columns
  • You're building page-level layouts
  • You need precise item placement
  • You want to create responsive layouts without media queries (using auto-fit/auto-fill)
  • You're working with complex, multi-region interfaces

Use Flexbox when:

  • You're arranging items in a single direction
  • You need dynamic spacing and alignment
  • You're building component-level layouts
  • You want items to grow or shrink based on available space
  • You're creating navigation, forms, or button groups

Combine both when:

  • Building complex applications (Grid for layout, Flexbox for components)
  • Creating responsive designs that need both macro and micro control
  • Working with design systems that have both layout and component patterns

Common Mistakes I've Seen

Overusing Flexbox for Two-Dimensional Layouts

I've watched developers create complex nested flexbox structures when a simple Grid would be cleaner:

/* Avoid this complex nesting */
.complex-flexbox {
  display: flex;
  flex-direction: column;
}
 
.row {
  display: flex;
  justify-content: space-between;
  margin-bottom: 1rem;
}
 
.column {
  display: flex;
  flex-direction: column;
  flex: 1;
  margin-right: 1rem;
}
 
/* Use this instead */
.simple-grid {
  display: grid;
  grid-template-columns: repeat(3, 1fr);
  grid-template-rows: repeat(2, auto);
  gap: 1rem;
}

Using Grid for Simple Alignments

Grid is overkill for simple centering or alignment tasks:

/* Overkill for simple centering */
.over-engineered {
  display: grid;
  place-items: center;
  height: 200px;
}
 
/* Better for simple centering */
.simple-center {
  display: flex;
  align-items: center;
  justify-content: center;
  height: 200px;
}

Ignoring Source Order and Accessibility

Both Grid and Flexbox can visually reorder elements, but this can break keyboard navigation and screen readers:

/* Be careful with visual reordering */
.navigation {
  display: flex;
  flex-direction: row-reverse; /* Visual change only */
}
 
.grid-layout {
  display: grid;
  grid-template-areas:
    "sidebar main"
    "footer footer";
}
 
/* Make sure HTML source order makes sense for accessibility */

Browser Support and Fallbacks

As of 2025, both Grid and Flexbox have excellent browser support. However, for legacy support or progressive enhancement, you can provide fallbacks:

/* Progressive enhancement approach */
.layout-container {
  /* Fallback for very old browsers */
  width: 100%;
  
  /* Flexbox fallback */
  display: flex;
  flex-wrap: wrap;
  
  /* Grid enhancement */
  display: grid;
  grid-template-columns: repeat(auto-fit, minmax(300px, 1fr));
  gap: 1rem;
}
 
/* Feature detection with CSS supports */
@supports (display: grid) {
  .layout-container {
    /* Grid-specific styles */
    grid-template-areas:
      "header header"
      "sidebar main"
      "footer footer";
  }
}

Real-World Migration Example

Recently, I migrated a complex dashboard from a float-based layout to Grid and Flexbox. Here's how the transformation looked:

/* Before: Float-based nightmare */
.old-dashboard {
  width: 100%;
  clear: both;
}
 
.old-sidebar {
  float: left;
  width: 25%;
  padding-right: 20px;
  box-sizing: border-box;
}
 
.old-main {
  float: left;
  width: 50%;
  padding: 0 10px;
  box-sizing: border-box;
}
 
.old-widgets {
  float: left;
  width: 25%;
  padding-left: 20px;
  box-sizing: border-box;
}
 
.clearfix::after {
  content: "";
  display: table;
  clear: both;
}
 
/* After: Clean Grid and Flexbox */
.new-dashboard {
  display: grid;
  grid-template-columns: 1fr 2fr 1fr;
  gap: 1rem;
  padding: 1rem;
}
 
.new-sidebar {
  display: flex;
  flex-direction: column;
  gap: 1rem;
}
 
.new-main {
  display: flex;
  flex-direction: column;
  gap: 1rem;
}
 
.new-widgets {
  display: flex;
  flex-direction: column;
  gap: 1rem;
}

The new version is not only cleaner and more maintainable but also naturally responsive without additional media queries.

Looking Forward

CSS layout continues to evolve. Features like Subgrid, Container Queries, and new sizing functions make Grid and Flexbox even more powerful. The key is understanding the strengths of each approach and combining them thoughtfully.

I've found that teams who understand when to use Grid versus Flexbox write more maintainable CSS, spend less time debugging layout issues, and create more responsive designs with fewer lines of code.

The choice isn't about which technology is "better"—it's about using the right tool for each specific layout challenge. With the decision framework and examples in this guide, you'll be well-equipped to make those choices confidently.